Publication ethics and malpractice statement

1. Publication and authorship: Authors declare that the submitted manuscript contains has not been previously published other than in conference abstract books and has not been submitted to another journal. All of the authors' possible conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, if related directly or indirectly to the submission, as well as all grants or other forms of financial support are acknowledged in a declaration at the end of the paper.

2. Author's responsibilities: A statement is made that all authors have significantly contributed to the research and all data in article are real and authentic and there is no plagiarism. Authors are under an obligation to participate in peer review process and to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.

3. Peer review and responsibility for the reviewers: All original, review and casuistic papers are subject to review by two anonymous reviewers from institutions other that that of the authors of publication. Reviewed articles should be treated confidentially. Reviewer's judgments should be objective, reviewers should have no conflict of interest with respect to the research, the authors and/or the research funders. Reviewers should point out relevant published work which is not yet cited. The list of reviewers for the articles in given year is published in the last number of journal published in this year.

4. Editorial responsibilities: Editors preserve anonymity of reviewers. Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article. Editors should have no conflict of interest with respect to articles they reject/accept. Editors only accept a paper when reasonably certain, and when errors are found, they promote publication of correction or retraction.