2016 issue 3

Back

Volume 32, issue 3

Original article

Cost-effectiveness of aripiprazole once-monthly compared with LAI risperidone and LAI olanzapine

Katarzyna Kolasa1, Izabela Lipka2, Joanna Jakubiak-Lasocka2, Maciej Niewada3, Michał Jakubczyk2, Jacek Wcislo4, Adam Martyniuk4, Zofia Wyszkowska5
1. Collegium Medicum, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
2. HealthQuest spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością Sp.k., Warszawa, Polska
3. Katedra i Zakład Farmakologii Doświadczalnej i Klinicznej, Warszawski Uniwersytet Medyczny, Polska, HealthQuest spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością Sp.k., Warszawa, Polska
4. Lundbeck Poland Sp. z o.o., Warszawa, Polska
5. Katedra i Zakład Farmakologii Doświadczalnej i Klinicznej, Warszawski Uniwersytet Medyczny, Polska
Farmakoterapia w Psychiatrii i Neurologii 2016, 32 (3), 157–169
Date of publication: 21-11-2016
DOI: http://dx.medra.org/10.17393/fpn.2016.12.001
Keywords: Schizophrenia, long-acting injectable (LAI) formulation, pharmacoeconomic analysis

Abstract

Objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate, in the Polish setting, the cost-effectiveness of aripiprazole once-monthly (Abilify Maintena®) in treating adults with schizophrenia, in the case of the recurrence of psychotic symptoms caused by a persistent and documented lack of compliance during antipsychotic oral therapy, in comparison with long acting injectable formulations of olanzapine and risperidone, which are currently refunded by the health system.

Material and methods. A decision-analytic Markov model was adopted. Both patients' compliance and the subsequent treatment switches were simulated. A10-year time horizon was assumed. The public payer perspective was adopted.

Results. The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of aripiprazole, given once-monthly, amounted to 70,777 PLN/QALY (quality-adjusted life year) and 57,649 PLN/QALY compared to risperidone and olanzapine LAI, respectively. Both ICURs were below the official threshold in Poland (119,577 PLN/QALY). The sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the results. It included alternative values of discount rates, utility set, third line of treatment, dosage schemes and a different time horizon.

Conclusions. In the Polish setting aripiprazole, given once-monthly, is a cost-effective treatment option as compared with currently reimbursed atypical LAI antipsychotics. The results were robust irrespective of the discount rate and range of utility adopted. The cost effectiveness of aripiprazole given in this form was proven with different approaches taken towards the choice of third line options and time horizon of the treatment.

Address for correspondence:
Katarzyna Kolasa
Collegium Medicum
Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
Sarmacka 28 b1
02-972 Warszawa
Poland
phone: +48 781 881 00
email: kkolasa@wum.edu.pl